The result of the elections draws a country more divided than it was before.
the preferences have shown that the pentastellati have been a winner everywhere on the national territory, always exploiting their claimed, but not well demonstrated in fact, will to change with respect to a political class that has changed a lot since their birth.
And they conquered the south with the promise, mind you unfeasible, of the income of citizenship.
After all, the followers of the Genoese comedian and his partner, or rather the son of his partner, being the direction transmitable dynastically, are accustomed to making believe things that do not exist.
Well backed by media interested only in making audiences more than explaining politics, and incompetent politicians absolutely unskilled in IT , they have managed for years to make believe that they are the new proposal for a direct democracy to be realized trought the use of the Web.
In other European countries, where the percentage of computer literacy, the diffusion of computers and connections across the territory is infinitely higher than the Italian one, the various parties that proposed the web as the sole link between the citizen and politics did not last long.
In our country, incredibly and inexplicably at a rational level, yes.
The German Pirates, who were inspiration for the "grillini", have practically disappeared, a little because the founders of the movement have realized the difficulty in carrying out the project, a little because the other political parties in some way have integrated the same concept in their own programs.
The other winners of the elections are the usual leghisti, now open to the south.
Another party born of protest against a political class of which they have become part with time reaching absolutely unwise results.
I remember Bossi, the father at a meeting here in Moncalieri, in the Turin hinterland, in which I participated together with, perhaps, 50 other citizens. More than 20 years ago.
Then the slogan was "celodurismo", the promise to remain firm to their intentions and the desire to send the old ruling class home because they were not allowing renewal and favoring the administrative centralization in the capital. The continue subsidize of the southern territories, judged unable to be autonomous, with the money the "padani" paid in taxation was another of their main point.
Over the years they have also become their ruling class who do not want to lose their privileges and have now included the south in their ranks.
Now they are only against migrants.
Salvini's party has not done realistic proposals to achieve results for the issue of migrants, so it seems they will not solve the problem.
But it does not matter.
They have taken millions of votes anyway.
The losers are those of the PD, Partito Democratico, or the Renziani's.
It remains a mystery how only one man has been able to engulf millions of preferences of citizens who until a few decades ago were on the left but the results are clear.
Wild protagonism, wrong choices to defend the faithful, even if obviously guilty, zero commitment on the territory and proposals dictated only by the polls of the last hour have led to the collapse.
The endless transition between nationalism and Europeanism never accomplished not only because of our country, an economy that has been in crisis for many years, and a financial aggression that does not find anyone able to limit it, a political economy that fails, worldwide , to face the new complex situations did not favor the action of government but PD could probably have done more.
We look forward to changes that will have to come with long-term programs to restore balance to a now democracy scene in danger.
The only one who is convinced he has won seems to be the subject from Arcore who is probably preparing one, the last one we hope for age limits met and exceeded, both his and his electors, shopping  campaign in our Parliament, often a place frequented from people very sensitive to money.
We will see if such a heterogeneous group of characters, united, if one looks carefully, only by the criticism of the same power they crave, will be able to form a government.
And if the PD will remain in the opposition or even give up the remaining of its principles to enter the majority.
Or we will go and vote again.
At the end of the day we only know for sure that our country does not have a political class (old or new) able to make long-term projects.
And to commit themselves to succeeding, even sacrificing those who make mistakes, trying to renew themselves in the process.
That's who we are: people who like to complain, and who prefer to raise their voices insted of taking responsibility and rationally engaging in order to achieve a useful result for the whole community.

Politic being the reflex of society...

On March 4th, comes the election day.
It amazes and slightly irritates this governmental tendency to inglesize terms that have their own Italian version.
Election day would be easily translated with Elezioni (Elections).
Job act as a labor law.
I hope that you do not think to accustom the Italians to the English language with these shortcuts because it is definitely wrong.
We will go to vote after 4 years of a government that is very criticized.
Renzi has arrived as the messiah, the new man, the scrapper, the man of reforms.
Unfortunately, it has no charisma, he is a big baby "bamboccione".
Once the dichotomy between good and bad is done, he defends those who are with him (especially if he is blonde) and sinks those who criticize him, even going against the interests of the political party in which he is a militant, representing the preferences of millions of citizens. With the legacy of a past during which, like no other party, has helped the formation of a democratic country like ours.
Actually he made many reforms, not all of them liked, but some of them: no one seems to have any memory of this.
And it lasted 4 years.
The famous quest for governability has now disappeared from the political lexicon.
After all if by political debate we mean the talk shows that for years distinguish the Italian palimpsests, something like governability, but like every other phenomenon, has a short life.
We need to feed the clashes, to show Italians outraged because they are not pampered enough by the government, be it in the form of state, regional, provincial, municipal, ...

So that there is something to blather about, a topic to choose from to be sure to be a protagonist for a few minutes in our personal political forums, at the bar, in the family, with friends, on social ..
Certain that what is news is bad news (one of the rules of communication) and that we have a short memory, increasingly short because of the continuous flow of new information (which then more than anything else are rumors, almost never precise or totally correct , destined to strike our attention in trying to direct public opinion for a moment).
Who wins the elections has always been that part of the electorate that is undecided until the end.
The faction that has in its personal morality certain values ​​will vote in one way. In spite of everything. And viceversa.
And then we have the people of the undecided, the bipolar (I do not say so, this particular concept is of the linguist Lakoff), that children of an internal disconnection, will decide the outcomes of the next election.
The think tanks of politicians know and study at table actions that can affect users / citizens, who are able to attract their attention, even temporarily but to leave a trace albeit weak, a clue that convinces the bipolar which side to choose .

And so we have the adepts of "il nano" the dwarf (I can only call them so, after so many years and so many disgusting and obviously amorous activities of the subject) that they continue to think that an entrepreneur can manage the future of the country. Even after discovering that during his governments his personal fortune has increased exponentially, even if they know that he has no more arguments for decades to entertain teams of young women who are kept and who envy them, not even in secret. Or activists who continue to follow the dictates of a league that has shown its smallness over the years, and have exploited the desire for change of the Italians and then become exactly like those who criticized and wanted to give them their own, at least at the beginning they promised, turgid foul.
Or the new generation of protesters, this time enticed by a comedian, making us laugh complaining about the political malice. And he resolved everything with a VAFFANCULO (FUCK OFF). And promising direct democracy through the web.

Too bad theis is just b.s.: not everyone has a PC, not all because they have a PC and an email are able to fully exploit the potential of the medium and even less able to understand sufficiently the topics that should deal with the structure of a movement that has a dynastic nature. Who has only done damage everywhere he has reached positions of power due to incompetence or lack of personal conviction in the promises made. And the only true merit of having knelt down voters and incompetent computer scientists who have redoed the look of their blogs and forums.

On the right I do not think it's worth making an analysis. It's the usual bunch of repressed fanatics, who do not want to understand that the world changes and that it's always been like that. They have always been destined to disappear but are continually finding a source of funding and inspiration from an elite social class that takes advantage of their energies to take care of their own personal interests.
Personally, I will vote for those who aspire to bring more freedom and equality to our country.

Or it also wants more Europe, a political and not just an economic one.
Both are long-term projects: one tries to change the social condition of our country, which is then the basis of everything.
The other wants to give more power to a dream, a reality made up of more than 500 millions different people, who have not been waging war for 60 years, but which can only become one, with its differences and its peculiarities but with its specificity, the desire to create a new mega entity capable of altering the old strategic logics

BLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOGBLOG BLOG